UQ Students should read the Disclaimer & Warning
Note: This page dates from 2005, and is kept for historical purposes.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>COMP1800 Web Page Peer Assessment</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
</head>
<body>
<h1> COMP1800 – Web Page Peer Assessment</h1>
<h2>Web Page Peer Assessment Criteria</h2>
<p>Your web site addresses to be assessed are:</p>
<ul>
<li> http://student.uq.edu.au/~<a href="#s1">s4026900</a>/assessment/</li>
<li> http://student.uq.edu.au/~<a href="#s2">s4056006</a>/assessment/</li>
<li> http://student.uq.edu.au/~<a href="#s3">s4055035</a>/assessment/</li>
</ul>
<p>When looking at the web page take care to look at the following:</p>
<ul>
<li> Links</li>
<li> Pictures </li>
<li>Content </li>
<li>Effort/Effectiveness </li>
<li>Overall Appearance</li>
</ul>
<p> Please take the time to browse your given web sites, and thoughtfully award
a mark (out of 5) which in your opinion represents the overall performance.
Please reply to this email with your scores and a brief comment, inserted
after each web address.</p>
<p> Your score, assessed by other students, will not be allocated unless your
assessment of these websites is received. Please wait until after 5pm Friday
24 October to check these web pages. If after this time they are not available,
please state this in your reply to me.</p>
<p> Thanks</p>
<p> Mandy Downing<br />
Lecturer Comp1800</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="s1">http://student.uq.edu.au/~s4026900/assessment/</h2>
<p> All links are correctly implemented, however having two menus, a traditional
one on the left hand side that links to external sites and another on the
right hand side, which contains links to different pages within this site,
is confusing and non-standard.</p>
<p> Pictures haven’t been effectively used; in fact, there is only one picture
in the content of the site, a simple chart.</p>
<p> Content appears to be well thought out, although unnecessarily complex at
times – with gratuitous use of large words in an apparent attempt to
sound learned. However, content is fairly accurate, on-topic and of a suitable
length.</p>
<p> A reasonable effort seems to have been invested in the construction of this
site, and the site, apart from its slightly confusing navigation, is effective
and pleasant to use. The site itself is efficiently and correctly coded.</p>
<p> 4 out of 5. </p>
<hr />
<h2 id="s2">http://student.uq.edu.au/~s4056006/assessment/</h2>
<p> Links are correctly implemented, easy to use and consistent.</p>
<p> Pictures and images haven’t really been used effectively, appearing
to have been used more because they had to throw some images in for assessment
than any logical content-related reason.</p>
<p> The content is slightly shorter than would be desirable, although it seems
to be on-topic and coherent.</p>
<p> This site is easy to use, with a pleasant appearance, but is let down by its
lack of content and hurried appearance. Also, use of the flash plug-in simply
for links is unnecessary.</p>
<p> 3 out of 5. </p>
<hr />
<h2 id="s3"> http://student.uq.edu.au/~s4055035/assessment/</h2>
<p> This site is not in the folder /assessment/</p>
<p> It has been uploaded to the root s4055035/ directory.</p>
<p> Links work fine and are easy to use and consistent across pages.</p>
<p> Images have not been used, either for appearance or to support the content.</p>
<p> Content is lengthy and relatively sound.</p>
<p> This site appears quite basic, and its reasonable content is let down by the
total lack of supporting images and the overall construction and appearance
of the textual frames based site, which also contains some inconsistencies
with the way links are displayed.</p>
<p> 2.5 out of 5</p>
<hr />
<p>27-Oct-2003</p>
<p> </p>
</body>
</html>