UQ Students should read the Disclaimer & Warning
Note: This page dates from 2005, and is kept for historical purposes.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>COMP1800 - Speech</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
</head>
<body>
<h1>COMP1800 Draft Speech</h1>
<p>This forms part of the <a href="COMP1800-english-tutorial" title="COMP1800 - English Tutorial Results">English
Tutorial component</a> of COMP1800.</p>
<p>This resulted in a mark of 3 ½ out of 5.</p>
<p>Hi, my name is Ned Martin and I’ll be talking about Web Accessibility.</p>
<hr />
<ul >
<li>What is Web Accessibility?
<ul >
<li>What is the Web?
<ul >
<li>Originally for scientific purposes</li>
<li>Content more important than presentation</li>
<li>Semantic text-based environment</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>When the Internet went public
<ul >
<li>Grew rapidly</li>
<li>Non-scientific people began to use it</li>
<li>Presentation became more important</li>
<li>Selling, images, backgrounds</li>
<li>Web more pleasing to most</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Undesired effect – hard to use for disabled people
<ul >
<li>Try to buy something</li>
<li>People prefer nicely formatted, coloured site, data in
tables</li>
<li>Imagine blind person – can’t see tables let
alone images</li>
<li>But before mass litigation, all invading political correctness
no one cared</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Web has grown as major source of public information
<ul >
<li>Renewed thrust to make accessible websites for PDA, no-mouse,
blind etc</li>
<li>Hastened by several successful lawsuits against commercial
sites</li>
<li>American laws that federal sites must be accessible by
all</li>
<li>Australian sites under disabilities discrimination legislation</li>
<li>In principle, website must be accessible to everyone</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Web Accessibility is creating websites that are accessible by anyone</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<ul >
<li>How do we fix this?
<ul >
<li>Designers expect standard browsers supporting images, fancy technology
etc</li>
<li>Problems arise when small screen devices, archaic browsers, screen
readers</li>
<li>Three approaches
<ul >
<li>Old unacceptable “most people use standard browsers
rest can go jump”</li>
<li>Design multiple sites for different users
<ul >
<li>Drawback – sites must be kept in synch.</li>
<li>Theoretically unlimited amount of different sites
to be created</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Design one site for all users – holy grail of web
accessibility
<ul >
<li>Consider original web
<ul >
<li>Basic content semantically marked-up</li>
<li>Paragraphs marked as paragraphs, headers
as header etc</li>
<li>Each part of document clearly labelled</li>
<li>Not cluttered with stylistic information
– get in way of blind etc</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Images etc cannot be accessible – alternate
descriptions provided</li>
<li>Standard viewers require stylistic information
<ul >
<li>Separate document contains stylistic information,
link to page</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Choice is up to user
<ul >
<li>View semantically rich content with or
without styling</li>
<li>Screen reader can logically read content</li>
<li>Modern browser can use style sheet do
display colourful site</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p>Hi, my name is Ned Martin, and I’ll be talking about Web Accessibility.</p>
<p>What exactly is Web Accessibility? Well, firstly, what is the web? We probably
all know that answer. It’s what we call the vast collection of web pages
on the internet. Originally, the internet was conceived in a scientific environment
for scientific and military purposes by people more interested in content
than presentation. It was a semantic text based environment. When the internet
went public several years ago, it grew rapidly and, as more non-scientific
people began to use it, presentation became more important. A huge page of
text doesn’t sell products as well as lots of pretty pictures on a nice
background. To make things look more pleasing, they introduced many presentational
things into the design of web pages – which did have the desired effect
and the web looked better for the majority of users. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, this had the undesired effect of making the web very hard to
use for many disabled people. Imagine you wanted to buy something from the
web. People are going to respond better to a nicely formatted, pleasantly
coloured page with images and data neatly presented in tables, and that’s
just what everyone on the web made in their efforts to get as many people
as possible to read their page or buy their products. Then imagine that you’re
blind and can’t see tables, let alone images – this is going to
make it rather hard to use that website, but back then, before the days of
mass litigation and all invading political correctness, no one much cared.</p>
<p>In the past few years, as the web has grown to a major source of public information,
there has been a renewed thrust to get people to make their websites so that
anyone can use them, regardless of whether they are blind, unable to use the
normal navigation tools we use like mice and keyboards, or just using a PDA
or mobile phone with a tiny screen. This movement has been hastened by several
lawsuits successfully brought against commercial websites that weren’t
useable by disabled people, and the introduction in America of laws that specify
federal sites must be accessible by all people. Here in Australia it is even
stricter, as Australian websites are covered by our disabilities discrimination
legislation making it unlawful to discriminate against disabled people because
of their disability. So, in principle, your website has to be as accessible
to disabled people as it is to anyone else, and that is what Web Accessibility
is all about – creating websites that are accessible by anyone. </p>
<p>Most websites designers expect the majority of their users to be using a “standard”
web browser that supports images, tables and all the latest fancy technologies
and they design accordingly. Problems arise when people use non-standard browsers,
ranging from people stuck in a time warp with archaic browsers, through to
the many web-enabled small-screen devices around, like the latest mobile phones,
right through to people who are forced by a disability to use screen readers
that convert the text of a website into voice. All these users have to be
catered for at the same time. There’s three main approaches to this,
the old and now unacceptable “most people use normal browsers and the
rest can go jump” approach, sadly still in common use, designing multiple
sites for different users, or the holy grail of web accessibility, making
your one website accessible to everyone. Designing multiple sites is the simplest
approach to web accessibility, but it does have some drawbacks. The worst
of these is that you have to design several entire sites to cater for different
users, basically all duplicating the same content. Imagine every time you
update something in one site, you have to change it in all the other sites,
and there’s no guarantee someone won’t come along one day and
get you to make another site for their particular need. That’s why it’s
better to try to get your one website to be accessible, and, ironically, this
is possible by considering how the web first started. It was text only, and
text was marked-up in such a way that it had a semantic meaning. Paragraphs
were marked as such, headings were marked as headers, in various levels of
importance – each part of a document was clearly labelled. That’s
the trick to creating accessible websites; the underlying content has to be
presented in a way that’s both semantically clear, and not cluttered
with stylistic information that is only going to get in the way of someone
who can’t make use of it. Some things, like images, simply can’t
be presented to, say, a blind person – but they can still be described,
and that person’s browser can read that description out to them. On
the other hand, you don’t want your viewers with their standard browsers
being reminded of the 1980’s internet when they’re looking at
your website. To overcome this we use a separate document containing stylistic
information linked to your web pages that tells the browsers how to display
those pages. This way, for the first time, the choice is up to the user. They
can view your semantically rich content with or without your styling. A screen
reader can look at your content, and use it’s semantic mark-up to figure
out what’s what, and read a logical description to a blind user, and
at the same time, a modern browser can look at your style sheet, apply it
to your content, and display the colourful, content rich sites most of us
are used to.</p>
<p>All work © Copyright 2003 Ned Martin</p>
<p>05-Sep-2003<br />
Updated with marks 11-Oct-2003</p>
</body>
</html>